Explainability in Practice: Counterfactuals, Heatmaps, and Model Cards

Image generated with Canva AI

AI’s power is undeniable, yet its decisions often feel like a sealed box.  Research shows that opacity is a primary driver of user distrust and slows adoption.  Explainable AI (XAI) turns that box into a transparent tool that developers, regulators, and end‑users can all understand.

Counterfactuals – “What Could Have Been”

Counterfactual explanations show how small changes in inputs could alter a model’s decision, giving users actionable insight.

• Case 1 – Credit‑scoring: A loan‑rejection model flagged an applicant as risky.  A counterfactual generated by DiCE revealed that $5 k higher annual income would flip the decision, giving the applicant a clear, actionable target.

• Case 2 – Medical imaging: In a retinal‑scan classifier, counterfactual visualisations showed that increasing the thickness of a specific vascular layer would change a “healthy” prediction to “disease,” helping clinicians see the exact image features the model uses.

Counterfactuals provide a roadmap of “what-if” scenarios, making AI reasoning tangible for end-users.

Heatmaps and Discriminant Explanations – Visual Influence Maps

Heatmaps highlight the areas or features that contribute most to a model’s decision, offering insight into the model’s reasoning.

• Case 3 – ECG analysis: A saliency heatmap highlighted the T‑wave region that drove a high‑risk arrhythmia prediction, letting cardiologists verify that the model focused on clinically relevant morphology.

• Case 4 – Discriminant heatmaps: SCOUT produced class‑specific heat-maps that emphasised image regions that support the predicted class and suppress the alternative class, offering a more nuanced view than traditional attribution maps.

These visualisations make abstract AI decisions interpretable, helping users validate and trust model outputs.

Model Cards – Structured Transparency

Model cards summarise key details about a model in a standardised format:

• Purpose and intended use

• Performance across sub-populations

• Known biases and limitations

• Ethical considerations

In one example, a banking AI model card revealed a 2% higher false-positive rate for applicants with limited credit history, prompting a redesign before deployment. Model cards provide a concise audit trail, ensuring accountability and safer use.

Impact in the Wild

Controlled experiments show that explainability has measurable benefits. In a study with 24 engineers, adding counterfactual explanations reduced false-alarm rates by approximately 12% and shortened decision times, confirming that explainability improves both accuracy and efficiency.

Counterfactuals offer “what-if” insights, heatmaps reveal where the model looks, and model cards provide a structured summary for accountability. Together, they transform black-box AI into trustworthy, interpretable systems. Explainability is not optional; it’s a cornerstone of responsible AI.

At RAIF, we believe that transparent, accountable AI is essential for building trust and ensuring technology serves people, not the other way around.